Sunglasses and Periocular Skin: UV, Wrinkles and the Case for Full Cov

Sunglasses and Periocular Skin: UV, Wrinkles and the Case for Full Coverage

The skin around the eyes is not the same as the skin on your cheek or forehead. It is the thinnest skin on the face — as thin as 0.5mm in the eyelid, compared to 2mm on the cheek. It has fewer sebaceous glands, less supporting dermis, and less structural collagen than other facial skin areas. It is also, by the nature of sunglass geometry, the zone of the face most likely to receive UV that has scattered around the edges of an inadequately sized sunglass frame.

The result: the periocular area — the eyelids, crow’s feet zone, under-eye skin, and lateral orbital rim — ages faster with UV exposure than most other facial skin zones, and carries a disproportionate risk of UV-induced skin cancers. The case for adequate sunglass frame coverage is not only about the eyes inside the frame; it is about the periocular skin around it.

This is the final C22 Anti-Aging & Longevity supporting post and the final post of Phase 3. It links back to the cluster pillar atsunglasses, anti-aging and longevity: the complete eye health guide.

Quick Answer

Periocular skin — eyelids, crow’s feet zone, under-eye area, and lateral orbital rim — is the thinnest skin on the face and among the most UV-sensitive. UV exposure causes photoaging (collagen loss, wrinkling, laxity) and photocarcinogenesis (disproportionately high rates of basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma around the eyelids). Sunglasses with adequate frame coverage reduce the UV dose to this zone. Wraparound and wide-frame geometries provide the most coverage. SPF sunscreen applied carefully to the periocular skin — without entering the eye — is the complementary protective measure for uncovered periocular skin zones.

•1. Periocular Skin: What Makes It Different

•2. UV Photoaging of Periocular Skin

•3. The Collagen and Elastin Mechanism

•4. UV and Crow’s Feet: Why the Outer Canthus Ages First

•5. Periocular Skin Cancer: A Disproportionate Risk Zone

•6. Basal Cell Carcinoma and the Eyelid

•7. Squamous Cell Carcinoma Around the Eye

•8. How Sunglass Frames Affect Periocular UV Dose

•9. The Geometry of Frame Coverage

•10. Wraparound Frames and Lateral Coverage

•11. SPF as the Complementary Periocular Protection

•12. The Anti-Aging Skin Case for UV400 Sunglasses

•13. Comparison Table

•14. Best For

•15. Common Mistakes

•16. Bottom Line

•17. FAQs

Part 1: Periocular Skin — What Makes It Different

The skin of the periocular zone has structural characteristics that make it both more UV-sensitive and more visibly age-affected by UV than most other facial skin:

• Thinness:the upper eyelid skin averages approximately 0.5mm in thickness — among the thinnest skin in the body. The lower eyelid is slightly thicker (0.6–0.7mm) but still dramatically thinner than cheek skin (approximately 2mm). Thin skin has less structural collagen to lose before wrinkling becomes visible.

•Low sebaceous gland density:sebaceous glands produce sebum that helps maintain the lipid barrier of the skin. The eyelid skin has fewer sebaceous glands per unit area than most facial skin, making it more vulnerable to the barrier disruption that UV causes in the stratum corneum and dermis.

•Limited subcutaneous fat:the periocular fat compartments provide structural support for the overlying skin. UV-driven collagen loss in the thin periocular skin is not cushioned by subcutaneous fat as it is in other facial zones, making the structural loss more immediately visible.

• High mobility:the eyelids move thousands of times per day for blinking. The crow’s feet zone flexes with every smile and squint. This repeated mechanical stress on already-thin, collagen-depleted skin accelerates the appearance of wrinkling from UV photoaging.

Part 2: UV Photoaging of Periocular Skin

UV-induced skin aging (photoaging) is distinct from chronological aging in its mechanisms and appearance. Chronological aging produces fine skin laxity from gradual collagen and elastin loss. Photoaging produces more dramatic structural changes: deep wrinkling, irregular pigmentation, skin thickening followed by thinning, and loss of the even texture of young skin.

In the periocular zone, photoaging is particularly visible because the baseline skin is already thin, already mobile, and already under mechanical stress from blinking and facial expression. UV exposure accelerates the photoaging process that produces the crow’s feet, eyelid crepe texture, and lateral orbital wrinkling that are among the most visible signs of facial aging.

The UV that drives periocular photoaging comes from three directions:

• Direct overhead UV:UV reaching the periocular area from directly above. The brow ridge provides some shielding for the upper eyelid, but the crow’s feet zone, lower eyelid, and under-eye area receive direct overhead UV without natural shielding.

• Reflected UV from below:particularly relevant in high-reflection environments (snow, sand, water, concrete). UV reflected upward from these surfaces reaches the under-eye skin and lower eyelid from below — angles that standard cosmetic sun protection focuses have often missed.

• Scattered UV around sunglass frames:UV that enters the periocular zone from the medial (inner), lateral (outer), superior (top), and inferior (bottom) gaps in sunglass frame coverage. Smaller lens formats, high-set frames, and non-wraparound geometries all allow significant UV scatter into the periocular zone from multiple directions.

Part 3: The Collagen and Elastin Mechanism

The structural integrity of periocular skin — its ability to resist wrinkling and maintain smooth texture — depends on the collagen and elastin network in the dermis. UV radiation damages this network through two primary mechanisms:

Collagen Photodegradation

UVB radiation directly damages collagen fibers and activates matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) — enzymes that degrade the collagen matrix. Chronic UV exposure creates a deficit: MMPs degrade existing collagen faster than fibroblasts can synthesize new collagen. The net result is progressive collagen depletion in the dermis. In thin periocular skin with its limited starting collagen reserve, this deficit becomes visibly apparent as wrinkling earlier than in thicker facial skin zones.

Elastin Degradation and Solar Elastosis

UVA radiation (315–400nm) penetrates deeper into the dermis than UVB, reaching the elastin fibers that provide the skin’s springback property. Chronic UVA exposure produces solar elastosis — the accumulation of degraded, dysfunctional elastin that gives chronically sun-exposed skin its characteristic thickened, yellow, leathery texture. In periocular skin, elastin damage produces the loss of lid tightness and orbital skin recoil that is visible as skin laxity around the eyes.

Both UVB and UVA are blocked by UV400 polycarbonate lenses. The reduction in UV dose to the periocular skin from adequate sunglass frame coverage directly reduces the rate of both MMP-driven collagen degradation and UVA-driven elastin damage in this zone.

Part 4: UV and Crow’s Feet — Why the Outer Canthus Ages First

The crow’s feet zone — the lateral orbital area extending from the outer corner of the eye across the temporal cheek — is typically the first periocular zone to show visible photoaging for several converging reasons:

• Lateral UV exposure gap:standard sunglass frames do not cover the lateral orbital area. UV enters from the side — both from direct lateral sun at low angles and from scattered ambient UV — reaching the crow’s feet skin from the temporal direction that most frames leave entirely exposed.

• Squinting accumulation:the orbicularis oculi muscle that produces crow’s feet contractions is activated by squinting, smiling, and eye closure. In bright sun without adequate sunglass coverage, repeated squinting from glare adds mechanical stress to UV-photodamaged skin, accelerating the appearance of lines.

• Low natural shade:unlike the upper eyelid (partially shaded by the brow ridge), the crow’s feet zone receives direct overhead and lateral UV without natural anatomical shading.

Sunglasses specifically reduce crow’s feet UV exposure in two ways: the lens and frame block direct UV from entering the lateral orbital zone, and the reduction in glare eliminates the squinting that mechanically stresses the already-UV-challenged skin. Adequate frame width is required for both benefits.

Part 5: Periocular Skin Cancer — A Disproportionate Risk Zone

The periocular area accounts for approximately 5–10% of all skin surface area on the face but accounts for a disproportionately high proportion of facial skin cancers — estimated at 5–10% of all skin cancers occurring on the face. The eyelid in particular is a common site for basal cell carcinoma (BCC), which is the most common skin cancer in the US.

The reasons for this disproportionate cancer risk:

•High UV dose from multiple directions:as described above, periocular skin receives UV from above, from reflected surfaces below, and from the gaps around sunglass frames. This multi-directional exposure accumulates more UV per unit area than many other facial skin zones.

•Thin skin with limited DNA repair buffer:thin skin with limited keratinocyte layers means UV-induced DNA damage (primarily cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers from UVB) has fewer cellular layers of repair buffer before reaching the basal keratinocytes where carcinogenesis initiates.

• Low historical protection:sunscreen is difficult and often avoided in the periocular zone because of the risk of ocular irritation. Many people who routinely apply facial sunscreen skip the immediate periocular zone, leaving it chronically unprotected by either sunscreen or sunglass coverage.

Part 6: Basal Cell Carcinoma and the Eyelid

Basal cell carcinoma is the most common skin cancer in the United States, with approximately 3.6 million diagnoses annually. The eyelid is one of the most common BCC sites on the face, with the lower eyelid and medial canthal area (inner corner of the eye) being the most frequently affected zones.

Eyelid BCC presents particular treatment challenges because of its proximity to the eye structure. Surgical excision (Mohs micrographic surgery is the preferred technique for eyelid BCC) must achieve complete margin clearance while minimizing functional damage to the eyelid’s role in protecting and lubricating the eye. Complex eyelid reconstructions may be required for larger tumors. The periocular location makes eyelid BCC more clinically significant than equivalently-sized BCC at other body sites.

UV400 sunglasses with adequate frame coverage reduce the UV dose to the lower eyelid, medial canthal area, and lateral orbital rim — the primary BCC risk zones — from the overhead and lateral UV sources that standard facial sunscreen application often misses.

Part 7: Squamous Cell Carcinoma Around the Eye

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the second most common skin cancer in the US, with approximately 1 million diagnoses annually. SCC of the eyelid and periocular skin, though less common than BCC in this zone, carries a higher risk of perineural invasion (spread along nerve pathways) and regional metastasis than BCC.

SCC is more strongly correlated with cumulative UV exposure than BCC, making it a disease that reflects lifetime UV burden in a direct way. The periocular skin’s high cumulative UV exposure — from multi-directional UV plus the chronic underprotection of this zone by sunscreen — creates a cumulative UV dose environment that reflects in the SCC incidence at this anatomical location.

Regular dermatological examination of the periocular area is appropriate for individuals with high lifetime UV exposure, personal history of skin cancer, or immunosuppression. UV400 sunglass coverage, combined with careful SPF application to the periocular zone, reduces the UV burden that contributes to SCC risk at this site.

Part 8: How Sunglass Frames Affect Periocular UV Dose

Not all sunglass frames provide equivalent periocular UV protection. The UV dose reduction to periocular skin depends on how much of the periocular zone the frame and lens cover. Several frame design factors determine this:

• Lens size:larger lenses cover more of the periocular zone below the brow and extending toward the cheek. Small lens formats (fashionable narrow or cat-eye minimal frames) leave significant lower eyelid and upper cheek skin exposed to direct UV overhead.

• Lens height:frames that sit close to the brow leave the upper orbital zone exposed. Frames with taller lens height that approach the brow better cover the upper periocular zone.

• Side coverage (wraparound vs open):non-wraparound frames with open temporal gaps allow UV to enter the crow’s feet zone from the lateral direction unobstructed. Wraparound geometry or frames with wider temporal coverage significantly reduce lateral UV entry.

• Frame fit:frames that sit close to the face with minimal gap between frame and skin reduce the amount of UV that can enter from medial, lateral, superior, and inferior directions through the gap between frame and face.

✨ NAVI EYEWEAR — UV400 COVERAGE FOR THE EYE AND THE SKIN AROUND IT.

UV400 polycarbonate. Polarized. Adequate frame coverage for periocular zone protection.

The sunglass habit that protects not just the eye but the skin around it from UV aging and cancer risk.

Buy 1, Get Any 3 Pairs Free — $119 for four pairs (~$30 each). Free shipping. Free replacements.

Shop:navieyewear.com/collections/polarized

Part 9: The Geometry of Frame Coverage

Periocular Zone	Primary UV Source	Sunglass Frame Protection	Supplemental Protection Needed
Upper eyelid	Overhead UV; brow gap scatter	Frames with upper lens edge near brow	SPF on brow-proximal skin; hat brim
Lower eyelid	Overhead UV; reflected UV from below	Larger lens extending toward cheek	SPF on lower eyelid (carefully, avoiding eye)
Medial canthus (inner corner)	Scattered ambient UV; nasal bridge gap	Frame design affects nasal gap coverage	SPF for medial canthal area
Lateral orbital (crow’s feet)	Direct lateral UV; temporal gap scatter	Wraparound frames; wider temporal coverage	SPF on crow’s feet zone
Under-eye / upper cheek	Reflected UV from below; overhead	Lower lens edge coverage extent	SPF on upper cheek and under-eye
Brow zone	Overhead UV	Limited sunglass coverage	Hat brim; SPF on brow

Part 10: Wraparound Frames and Lateral Coverage

The crow’s feet zone and lateral orbital area are the periocular zones most poorly protected by standard sunglass frames. Standard non-wraparound frames have an open temporal side that leaves the lateral orbital rim, crow’s feet skin, and temporal cheek exposed to UV from the side.

Wraparound frame geometry — where the lens curves around the temporal side of the face to reduce the gap between lens edge and face — addresses this gap.

The wraparound design provides:

• Reduced lateral UV entry:the curved lens reduces the unobstructed UV path from the temporal direction to the crow’s feet zone and lateral orbital rim skin.

• Reduced squint-producing glare:lateral glare from low-angle sun is one of the most common squinting triggers. Wraparound coverage that blocks lateral peripheral glare reduces squinting, which reduces the mechanical stress on crow’s feet skin from repeated orbicularis oculi contractions.

• Wind and particle protection:particularly relevant for cyclists, runners, and outdoor workers, wraparound coverage also reduces wind and debris entry into the orbital zone.

For outdoor activities with significant lateral UV exposure — cycling, running, hiking, skiing — wraparound UV400 frames provide both ocular and periocular skin protection advantages over standard open-frame geometries.

Part 11: SPF as the Complementary Periocular Protection

Sunglasses cannot cover every periocular skin zone. The medial canthal area, the zone between the upper frame edge and the brow, and the outer corners that even wraparound frames leave partially exposed all represent periocular skin zones that benefit from SPF sunscreen in addition to sunglass coverage.

SPF application to the periocular zone requires care because the ocular surface is sensitive to sunscreen ingredients, particularly chemical UV filters. Practical approaches:

•Mineral sunscreens (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide):less likely to cause ocular irritation than chemical filters. Physical UV blocking without the potential for chemical sensitization of the conjunctiva.

• SPF formulations designed for periocular use:eye-area SPF sticks and creams specifically formulated for periocular skin are available from dermatology brands and provide UV protection without the irritation risk of standard facial sunscreens applied too close to the eye.

•Application technique:apply to the orbital rim, crow’s feet zone, and under-eye area, stopping approximately 5mm from the lash line. Avoid direct application to the eyelid margin or lash line where migration into the eye is likely.

•Hat brim for superior periocular protection:a hat brim that shades the brow and upper orbital zone provides overhead UV shielding for the periocular areas above the sunglass frame upper edge.

The complete periocular protection stack: UV400 sunglass coverage + careful periocular SPF + hat brim for superior zone. These three elements together address the full periocular UV exposure geometry that sunglasses alone do not completely cover.

Part 12: The Anti-Aging Skin Case for UV400 Sunglasses

The anti-aging skin argument for UV400 sunglasses is distinct from the ocular health argument but equally compelling:

• Crow’s feet and periocular wrinkling:the wrinkles most closely associated with sun damage in the facial aging literature are periocular. Adequate sunglass coverage that reduces UV dose to the crow’s feet zone, and eliminates squinting from glare, reduces both the UV photoaging driver and the mechanical stress driver of this wrinkling.

•Under-eye skin quality:the thin under-eye skin that shows dark circles, fine lines, and crepey texture with age is particularly UV-sensitive. Sunglass coverage that extends toward the upper cheek reduces the UV dose to this zone.

• Consistent coverage matters more than category:UV photoaging of periocular skin accumulates on every outdoor day with UV exposure — on overcast March days as well as sunny July ones. Consistent UV400 sunglass wear across the year is more effective for periocular skin anti-aging than wearing Cat 3 only on sunny days.

The aging prevention case for consistent UV400 use is developed more fully inprotecting your eyes from aging: the UV prevention guide.

Part 13: Comparison Table — Periocular UV Protection Methods

Protection Method	Periocular Zones Covered	UV Type Blocked	Practical Considerations
UV400 sunglass lenses	Zones within the lens area	UV-A and UV-B (all below 400nm)	Most consistently applied; daily outdoor use; does not cover all periocular zones
Wraparound UV400 frames	Lens zone + improved lateral coverage	UV-A and UV-B	Better crow’s feet coverage than standard frames; useful for outdoor sport
Standard non-wraparound frames	Lens zone only	UV-A and UV-B	Leaves crow’s feet and lateral orbital zone exposed to lateral UV
Mineral SPF sunscreen (periocular)	Applied areas only	UV-A and UV-B	Covers zones sunglasses miss; requires careful application near eye; must be reapplied
Hat brim (wide)	Superior periocular (brow/upper orbital)	UV-A and UV-B (overhead)	Best for overhead UV reduction to brow zone; does not cover lateral or reflected UV
Standard chemical SPF (periocular)	Applied areas only	UV-A and UV-B	Higher ocular irritation risk than mineral; effective where tolerated
No protection	None	None blocked	Full periocular UV accumulation; highest photoaging and cancer risk

Part 14: Best For

UV400 Wraparound Frames — Best For:

•Outdoor sport and activity users (cyclists, runners, hikers, tennis, skiing) where lateral UV and glare entry is most significant and where crow’s feet zone coverage is highest priority

•Individuals with high lifetime lateral UV exposure from outdoor work or recreation who want maximum periocular skin coverage

Standard UV400 Frames with Adequate Lens Size — Best For:

•Daily urban and driving use where periocular coverage across the orbital zone from above and below is more relevant than lateral coverage

•The broadest everyday UV400 periocular protection for most US daily outdoor environments

UV400 Sunglass + Mineral SPF + Hat Brim — Best For:

•Complete periocular protection in high-UV environments (beach, desert, tropical travel, mountain hiking) where all UV angles are relevant and maximum protection justifies additional steps

Part 15: Common Mistakes

• Wearing small-lens fashion frames and believing they provide full periocular UV protection:narrow lenses and small-format frames with large gaps above, below, and to the sides of the lens provide minimal periocular skin UV protection even when the lens itself is UV400. The lens must cover the periocular zone to protect it.

•Not applying SPF to the periocular zone:most people who use facial sunscreen skip the immediate periocular area because of concern about eye irritation. This leaves the highest UV-sensitive zone of the face chronically unprotected by either sunscreen or sunglass coverage in the zones between frame edge and brow.

•Attributing periocular wrinkling only to facial expression and ignoring UV:crow’s feet and periocular aging have two compounding drivers: the mechanical stress of orbital muscle expression and UV photoaging. Both contribute. Sunglasses address both — UV via blocking, mechanical via reducing squinting from glare.

• Not recognizing eyelid changes as potential skin cancer:persistent eyelid margin changes (a slow-growing, non-healing lesion, loss of lash follicles, irregular pigmentation at the lid margin) can represent eyelid BCC and warrant prompt ophthalmological or dermatological evaluation. The periocular skin is not exempt from cancer surveillance.

Bottom Line

Periocular skin is the most UV-vulnerable zone of the face — the thinnest, the most mobile, and the most chronically underprotected by sunscreen. UV photoaging of this zone produces the crow’s feet, eyelid laxity, and under-eye skin quality changes that are among the most visible signs of facial aging. UV-driven carcinogenesis in the periocular zone, particularly BCC of the lower eyelid and medial canthal area, produces a disproportionately high skin cancer burden given the small skin surface area involved.

UV400 sunglasses with adequate frame coverage — broad lens size, close-fit frame, wraparound geometry for outdoor sport — reduce the UV dose to the periocular zone from above, from below in reflection environments, and from the lateral directions that standard frames leave exposed. The periocular skin protection case for sunglasses exists alongside and complementing the ocular protection case, and it provides an additional dimension of anti-aging and cancer prevention value to the UV400 daily outdoor habit.

The complete periocular protection: UV400 sunglass coverage + careful mineral SPF application to periocular gaps + hat brim for superior shading. All three are relevant. UV400 sunglasses are the most consistently applicable daily tool of the three.

Browse UV400 polarized options atnavieyewear.com/collections/polarized. Add 4 pairs — Buy 1, Get Any 3 Free auto-applies. Free shipping. Free replacements.

Frequently Asked Questions

Do sunglasses help prevent wrinkles around the eyes?

Yes, through two mechanisms. First, UV400 lens coverage reduces the UV dose to periocular skin in the orbital zone covered by the lens, slowing UV-driven collagen degradation and elastin damage that produce photoaging wrinkles. Second, the glare elimination from polarized lenses reduces squinting — the repeated orbicularis oculi muscle contractions from squinting in bright sun are a significant mechanical driver of crow’s feet formation on already UV-challenged thin periocular skin.

What type of sunglass frame provides the best periocular skin protection?

Frames with larger lens size, closer face fit, and wraparound temporal coverage provide the most periocular skin UV protection. Wraparound frames specifically reduce lateral UV entry into the crow’s feet and lateral orbital zone. For outdoor sport and high-UV activity, wraparound UV400 frames are optimal for both periocular skin and ocular protection. For urban daily use, frames with adequate lens size and close fit provide good orbital zone coverage.

Can I apply sunscreen around my eyes for periocular protection?

Yes, with appropriate product selection and technique. Mineral sunscreens (zinc oxide, titanium dioxide) are the preferred option for periocular application because they have lower ocular irritation risk than chemical UV filters. Apply to the orbital rim, crow’s feet zone, and under-eye area, stopping approximately 5mm from the lash line. Products specifically formulated for periocular use (eye-area SPF sticks) are available from dermatology brands and are the safest approach for close-to-eye application.

Is the skin around the eyes more prone to skin cancer?

Yes. The periocular area accounts for approximately 5–10% of all facial skin cancers despite representing a small proportion of facial skin surface. The lower eyelid and medial canthal area are common basal cell carcinoma sites. Eyelid BCC is treated with particular care (Mohs surgery preferred) because of its proximity to the eye structure. The cumulative UV from multiple directions, combined with chronic under-protection by sunscreen, explains this disproportionate skin cancer burden.

Do crow’s feet come from squinting or from UV?

Both, and they are compounding. Repeated orbicularis oculi muscle contraction from squinting creates the mechanical crease lines in the crow’s feet zone. UV photoaging degrades the collagen and elastin in this already-thin skin, reducing its ability to spring back from these repeated mechanical stresses. UV-protected periocular skin maintains better elasticity and collagen density, making it more resilient to the mechanical stress of expression. Sunglasses address both: UV400 blocking reduces the photoaging, and glare elimination reduces the squinting.

How does UV reach the periocular area if I’m wearing sunglasses?

UV reaches periocular skin from the gaps around the sunglass frame: above the upper frame edge toward the brow, below the lower lens edge toward the cheek, from the medial gap at the nose bridge, and particularly from the temporal/lateral gap to the crow’s feet zone. In non-wraparound frames this lateral gap is entirely open. Reflected UV from below (from snow, sand, water, concrete) also enters the periocular zone from underneath the frame, reaching the lower eyelid and under-eye skin at angles that the lens does not cover.

Does wearing sunglasses slow down eyelid aging?

UV400 sunglass coverage of the eyelid zone reduces the UV contribution to eyelid photoaging — the collagen degradation and elastin damage that produce eyelid laxity, crepey texture, and wrinkling. The reduction in UV dose, combined with reduced squinting from glare, addresses two of the modifiable drivers of eyelid skin aging. The rate of aging slowdown depends on how much of the eyelid zone the frame covers and how consistently the sunglasses are worn.

Should I see a dermatologist about periocular skin changes?

Any persistent, slow-growing, non-healing lesion on the eyelid margin or periocular skin warrants dermatological or ophthalmological evaluation. Loss of eyelid lashes from a focal area, irregular pigmentation at the lid margin, or a pearly or ulcerated lesion in the periocular zone are signs that warrant prompt evaluation for eyelid BCC or other periocular skin malignancy. Annual full-body skin examination by a dermatologist is appropriate for individuals with high lifetime UV exposure, multiple sunburns, or personal/family history of skin cancer.

Supporting Articles

•Sunglasses, Anti-Aging and Longevity: The Complete Eye Health Guide

•Protecting Your Eyes from Aging: The UV Prevention Guide

•Cataracts: The Preventable Epidemic and UV’s Role

•UV400 Sunglasses as a Long-Term Investment in Vision

•Macular Degeneration: What You Can Do Today to Reduce Your Risk

•Sunglasses by Climate and Geography: The Complete US Regional Guide

•Sunglasses for Hot, Sunny Climates: The Sun Belt and Southwest Guide

•Do You Need Sunglasses on Overcast Days? The UV Science

•Navi Eyewear UV400 Polarized Sunglasses Collection

UV400 COVERAGE. FOR THE EYE AND THE SKIN AROUND IT.

UV400 polycarbonate. Polarized. Adequate frame coverage for periocular UV protection.

Reduces crow’s feet UV photoaging. Eliminates squinting from glare. Reduces periocular skin cancer UV burden.

Buy 1, Get Any 3 Pairs Free — $119 for four pairs. Free shipping. Free replacements.

Shop now:navieyewear.com/collections/polarized

SOURCES & CITATIONS

[1] Situm M, Buljan M, Cavka V, et al..“Skin changes in the elderly people — how strong is the influence of the UV radiation on skin aging?.”Collegium Antropologicum, 2010.View source

[2] Brenner M, Hearing VJ.“The protective role of melanin against UV damage in human skin.”Photochemistry and Photobiology, 2008.View source

[3] Cook BE Jr, Bartley GB.“Treatment options and future prospects for the management of eyelid malignancies.”Ophthalmology, 2001.View source

[4] Rosenthal FS, Bakalian AE, Lou CQ, Taylor HR.“The effect of sunglasses on ocular exposure to ultraviolet radiation.”American Journal of Public Health, 1988.View source

[5] Sliney DH.“UV radiation ocular exposure dosimetry.”Documenta Ophthalmologica, 1994.View source

[6] American Academy of Ophthalmology.“Sunglasses: choosing the right pair for UV protection.”AAO EyeSmart, 2023.View source

Sunglasses and Periocular Skin: UV, Wrinkles and the Case for Full Coverage (2025)

Sunglasses and Periocular Skin: UV, Wrinkles and the Case for Full Coverage (2025)